This article is published in the forthcoming issue.

Diagnostic value of dry lips in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: A prospective cohort study

Dry lips in acute appendicitis diagnosis

Authors

Keywords:

Appendicitis, Physical examination, Dry lips, Sensitivity and Specificity, Dehydration

Abstract

Background/Aim: Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, but accurate diagnosis remains challenging. Simple bedside findings may complement established diagnostic strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dry lips as a bedside clinical sign in adults presenting with suspected acute appendicitis.

Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital from June 2024 to May 2025. Consecutive adults presenting with suspected acute appendicitis were enrolled. Dry lips were assessed during the initial examination before intravenous fluid administration, laboratory testing, or imaging. Histopathological examination confirmed appendicitis in operated patients, whereas non-operated patients were classified as not having appendicitis based on negative computed tomography findings and/or an uneventful 30-day clinical follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: Of 115 patients screened, 96 met the eligibility criteria and were included. Acute appendicitis was confirmed in 44 patients (45.8%), and dry lips were present in 36 (37.5%). Dry lips had a sensitivity of 54.6% (95% CI, 38.8-69.6%) and a specificity of 76.9% (95% CI, 63.2-87.5%). The positive likelihood ratio was 2.36 (95% CI, 1.34-4.16), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.41-0.84). Combining dry lips with a C-reactive protein level of at least 10 mg/L increased specificity to 93.9% (95% CI, 84.4-98.0%) and the positive likelihood ratio to 6.61 (95% CI, 2.24-22.49).

Conclusion: Dry lips showed moderate specificity but limited sensitivity for diagnosing acute appendicitis. This finding is not sufficiently accurate for use as a standalone test but may provide a rapid, cost-free adjunct to bedside assessment when interpreted with inflammatory markers and other clinical findings. Larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults: A review. JAMA. 2021;326(22):2299-311. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20502.

Walter K. Acute appendicitis. JAMA. 2021;326(22):2339. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20410.

Chisthi MM, Surendran A, Narayanan JT. RIPASA and AIR scoring systems are superior to Alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;59:138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.029.

Andersson M, Kolodziej B, Andersson RE. Validation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score. World J Surg. 2021;45(7):2081-91. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06042-2.

Jose T, Rajesh PS. Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score in comparison to Alvarado score in acute appendicitis. Surg J (N Y). 2021;7(3):e127-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731446.

Kim JJY, Dobson BH, Ng CLH, Thong DW, Arthur T, Parker D, et al. Can normal inflammatory markers rule out acute appendicitis? The reliability of biochemical investigations in diagnosis. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(10):1970-4. doi: 10.1111/ans.15559.

Arruzza E, Milanese S, Li LSK, Dizon J. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography and ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiography (Lond). 2022;28(4):1127-41. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.08.012.

Podda M, Pisanu A, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Damaskos D, Augustin G, et al. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on clinical scores: Is it a myth or reality? Acta Biomed. 2021;92(4):e2021231. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i4.11666.

Mantoglu B, Gonullu E, Akdeniz Y, Yigit M, Firat N, Akin E, et al. Which appendicitis scoring system is most suitable for pregnant patients? A comparison of nine different systems. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00310-7.

Ak R, Doğanay F, Ünal Akoğlu E, Akoğlu H, Uçar AB, Kurt E, et al. Predictive value of scoring systems for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in emergency department patients: Is there an accurate one? Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2020;27(5):262-9. doi: 10.1177/1024907919840175.

Capoglu R, Gonullu E, Bayhan Z, Coskun M, Harmantepe T, Kucuk F. Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis. Updates Surg. 2022;74(3):1035-42. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01272-y.

Chaitra S. C-reactive protein (CRP) as a diagnostic parameter in acute appendicitis: a double blind study. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2014;1(9):1197-201.

Omraninava M, Javan S, Mahmodi G. Precision of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Soc Determ Health. 2022;8:1-6. doi:10.22037/sdh.v8i1.38183.

Mohammadi Tofigh A, Zebarjadi Bagherpour J, Samsami M, Nematihonar B, Ayazi K, Tahmasbi H, et al. Dry lips as a possible new clinical sign in diagnosis of appendicitis in adults: A short report. J Iran Med Counc. 2020;3(2):106-8.

Amouei AH, Rezahoseini O, Rahnama A, Tavakoleian Ferdosieh V. Evaluation of Dry Lips as a New Sign in Clinical Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children: A Short Report. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2013;12(9):769-76.

Graphical Abstract

Downloads

Published

2026-08-08

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Akeely Y, Alblowi N, Alanazi W, Begum Patel S, Bokhari N, Alshaheen R, Afaifi A. Diagnostic value of dry lips in patients with suspected acute appendicitis: A prospective cohort study: Dry lips in acute appendicitis diagnosis. J Surg Med [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 8 [cited 2026 Aug. 13];10(8):e8648. Available from: https://jsurgmed.com/article/view/8648