Outcomes of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented proximal femoral nail

Cement-augmented proximal femoral nail

Authors

Keywords:

Cement augmented proximal femoral nail, Osteoporosis, Trochanteric

Abstract

Background/Aim: Implant failure due to poor bone quality in osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures increases mortality and morbidity, leading to secondary surgery and complications in patients. Our study aims to evaluate the early functional and radiologic outcomes and complications of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures using a cement-augmented proximal femoral nail design.

Methods: This case series included 24 patients AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type 31-A2.2 in 10 patients, A2.3 in 7 patients, 31-A3.1 in 4 patients, and A3.2 in 3 patients). Proximal femoral nail cement augmentation was invariably accomplished by injecting polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement into the femoral head. The clinical outcome was rated using the Harris Hip Score (HSS) at the time of the final follow-up. The results were recorded as excellent (score >90), decent (score 89–70), and poor (score 70–0). Radiographs were reviewed for implant failure and union. Implant failure was defined as lag screw cut-out or perforation.

Results: The average age of our sample was 73.8 (6.9) years, And the mean follow-up time was 13.6 months. In all patients, union was accomplished. Implant failure and cut-out were not observed in any of the patients. The average Harris score at the final follow-up was 80.6. According to the HSS, four patients had excellent, 15 had good, and 5 had poor functional results.

Conclusion: Cement-augmented femoral nails can be used safely with a low complication rate in osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fractures. In future studies, controlled studies should be conducted for this nail design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Stramazzo L, Ratano S, Monachino F, Pavan D, Rovere G, Camarda L. Cement augmentation for trochanteric fracture in elderly: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 2020 Oct 20;15:65-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.034

Sandmann G, Biberthaler P, Pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. Unfallchirurg. 2015 May;118(5):447-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-015-0007-x

Azagra R, López-Expósito F, Martin-Sánchez JC, Aguyé A, Moreno, Cooper C, et al. Changing trends in the epidemiology of hip fracture in Spain. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Apr;25(4):1267-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2586-0

Lenich A, Vester H, Nerlich M, Mayr E, Stöckle U, Füchtmeier B. Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip-blade vs screw. Injury. 2010 Dec;41(12):1292-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.499

Russel TA. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. Intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. pp. 2075–129. In: Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta III Paul, McKee MD, editors

Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, Mommsen P. Tip Apex Distance, Hip Screw Placement, and Neck Shaft Angle as Potential Risk Factors for Cut-Out Failure of Hip Screws After Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures. Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2347-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1636-0

Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk PR. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Jt J. 2014 Aug;96-B(8):1029-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B8.33644

Gupta RK, Gupta V, Gupta N. Outcomes of osteoporotic trochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented dynamic hip screw. Indian J Orthop. 2012 Nov;46(6):640-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.104193

Dall’Oca C, Maluta T, Moscola A, Lavini F, Bartolozzi, P. Cement augmentation of intertrochanteric fractures stabilised with intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010 Nov;41(11):1150-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.026

Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS. Changes in trabecular pattern in the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Apr;52(3):457-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197052030-00005

Baumgaertner M, Curtin S, Lindskog D, Keggi J. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012

Banaszkiewicz, Paul A. "Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation." Classic papers in orthopaedics. Springer, London, 2014. 13-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_3

Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00716-8

Gazotti, Gabriele Matino G, Tsatsis C, Sacchetti G, Baudi P, Catani F. Causes and treatments of lag screw's cut out after intramedullary nailing osteosinthesis for trochanteric fractures. Acta Bio-Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 2014 Aug 20;85(2):135-43.

Bojan A, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jönsson A. Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma Nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013 Jan 2;14:1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-1

Bonnaire F, Weber A, Bösl O, Eckhardt C, Schwieger K, Linke B. “Cutting out” in pertrochanteric fractures–problem of osteoporosis? Unfallchirurg. 2007 May;110(5):425-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-007-1248-0

Larsson Sune. Cement augmentation in fracture treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2006 May;95(2):111-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690609500206

Kammerlander C, Hem ES, Klopfer T, Gebhard F, Sermon A, Dietrich M, et al. Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)–A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1436-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.022

Fensky F, Nüchtern JV, Kolb JP, Huber S, Rupprecht M, Jauch SY, et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures a biomechanical cadaver study. Injury. 2013 Jun;44(6):802-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.003

Erhart S, Schmoelz W, Blauth M, Lenich A. Biomechanical effect of bone cement augmentation on rotational stability and pull-out strength of the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation. Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11);1322-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.04.010

Donaldson AJ, Thomson HE, Harper NJ, Kenny NW. Bone cement implantation syndrome. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009 Jan;102(1):12-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen328

Schuetze K, Ehinger S, Eickhoff A, Dehner C, Gebhard F, Richter PH. Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: is it safe? Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2021 May;141(5);803-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03531-2

Wu MH, Lee PC, Peng KT, Wu CC, Huang TJ, Hsu R WW. Complications of cement-augmented dynamic hip screws in unstable type intertrochanteric fractures-a case series study. Chang Gung Med J. 2012 July;3(4);345-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.106135

Downloads

Published

2022-10-17

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Fidan F, Lapcin O. Outcomes of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented proximal femoral nail: Cement-augmented proximal femoral nail. J Surg Med [Internet]. 2022 Oct. 17 [cited 2022 Dec. 7];6(10):854-7. Available from: https://jsurgmed.com/article/view/7445