Research Article
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Cite

The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach

Year 2021, Volume 5, Issue 9, 988 - 991, 01.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.901094

Abstract

Background/Aim: Hip fractures, commonly observed worldwide, cause severe functional problems and pose an economic burden. This study investigated the effects of different surgical approaches of joint capsule repair on morbidity and mortality and aimed to increase the quality of life after surgery with the most proper treatment option. Methods: This prospective case-control study was conducted on 186 patients over 65 years of age admitted to our clinic from 2006 to 2012 for displaced femoral neck fracture. All patients were treated via a hemiarthroplasty. The patients (66 males, 110 females with an overall mean age of 80.43 years (70-90)) were followed up regularly. All patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 was treated with capsular repair, and Group 2 without. The groups were compared in terms of pre-and peri-operative data, demographics, concomitant diseases, post-operative complications, mortality rates, pain level, and hip scores. Hospitalization time, average surgical duration, and time from fracture to the operation were also noted. Results: We found no significant differences between the groups in terms of surgery preferences (P>0.05). The survival of patients was significantly higher, blood loss was significantly less, and perioperative mortality rates were insignificantly lower in the noncapsular repair group (p=0.005, p=0.015, and p=0.515, respectively). Conclusion: The use of capsule repair during hip hemiarthroplasty in patients over 65 years of age had no negative impact on mortality or morbidity. Surgical preference changes during hip arthroplasty procedures are essential.

References

  • 1. Corbett KL, Losina E, Nti AA, Prokopetz JJ, Katz JN. Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PloS one. 2010;5(10):e13520.
  • 2. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2001;385:95-9.
  • 3. Smith G, Tsang J, Molyneux S, White T. The hidden blood loss after hip fracture. Injury. 2011;42(2):133-5.
  • 4. Kumar D, Mbako A, Riddick A, Patil S, Williams P. On admission haemoglobin in patients with hip fracture. Injury. 2011;42(2):167-70.
  • 5. Tomlinson J, Zwirner J, Ondruschka B, Prietzel T, Hammer N. Innervation of the hip joint capsular complex: A systematic review of histological and immunohistochemical studies and their clinical implications for contemporary treatment strategies in total hip arthroplasty. PloS one. 2020;15(2):e0229128.
  • 6. Karaaslan F, Yurdakul E, Korkmaz M, Duygulu F, Baktır A. Is cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty a safe treatment for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients? Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2015:1063. doi:10.2147/cia.s85039.
  • 7. Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014;22(9):595-603.
  • 8. Lu Y, Wu Z, Tang X, Gu M, Hou B. Effect of articular capsule repair on postoperative dislocation after primary total hip replacement by the anterolateral approach. Journal of International Medical Research. 2019;47(10):4787-97.
  • 9. Zhang B, Wang F, Tian M, Yin W, You X, Li D et al. Articular capsule repair in initial artificial hip replacement via anterolateral approach to the hip joint. Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents. 2016;30(2):441-7.
  • 10. Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2015;30(3):419-34.
  • 11. Wang Z, Hou J-z, Wu C-h, Zhou Y-j, Gu X-m, Wang H-h, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2018;13(1):1-11.

Year 2021, Volume 5, Issue 9, 988 - 991, 01.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.901094

Abstract

References

  • 1. Corbett KL, Losina E, Nti AA, Prokopetz JJ, Katz JN. Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PloS one. 2010;5(10):e13520.
  • 2. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2001;385:95-9.
  • 3. Smith G, Tsang J, Molyneux S, White T. The hidden blood loss after hip fracture. Injury. 2011;42(2):133-5.
  • 4. Kumar D, Mbako A, Riddick A, Patil S, Williams P. On admission haemoglobin in patients with hip fracture. Injury. 2011;42(2):167-70.
  • 5. Tomlinson J, Zwirner J, Ondruschka B, Prietzel T, Hammer N. Innervation of the hip joint capsular complex: A systematic review of histological and immunohistochemical studies and their clinical implications for contemporary treatment strategies in total hip arthroplasty. PloS one. 2020;15(2):e0229128.
  • 6. Karaaslan F, Yurdakul E, Korkmaz M, Duygulu F, Baktır A. Is cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty a safe treatment for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients? Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2015:1063. doi:10.2147/cia.s85039.
  • 7. Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014;22(9):595-603.
  • 8. Lu Y, Wu Z, Tang X, Gu M, Hou B. Effect of articular capsule repair on postoperative dislocation after primary total hip replacement by the anterolateral approach. Journal of International Medical Research. 2019;47(10):4787-97.
  • 9. Zhang B, Wang F, Tian M, Yin W, You X, Li D et al. Articular capsule repair in initial artificial hip replacement via anterolateral approach to the hip joint. Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents. 2016;30(2):441-7.
  • 10. Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2015;30(3):419-34.
  • 11. Wang Z, Hou J-z, Wu C-h, Zhou Y-j, Gu X-m, Wang H-h, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research. 2018;13(1):1-11.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Orthopedics
Journal Section Research article
Authors

Mehmet YETİŞ
AHI EVRAN UNIVERSITY
0000-0002-8193-4344
Türkiye


Emre YURDAKUL (Primary Author)
System Hospital
0000-0002-9018-889X
Türkiye

Publication Date September 1, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021, Volume 5, Issue 9

Cite

Bibtex @research article { josam901094, journal = {Journal of Surgery and Medicine}, issn = {}, eissn = {2602-2079}, address = {jsurgmed@gmail.com}, publisher = {Fatih BAŞAK}, year = {2021}, volume = {5}, pages = {988 - 991}, doi = {10.28982/josam.901094}, title = {The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach}, key = {cite}, author = {Yetiş, Mehmet and Yurdakul, Emre} }
APA Yetiş, M. & Yurdakul, E. (2021). The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach . Journal of Surgery and Medicine , 5 (9) , 988-991 . DOI: 10.28982/josam.901094
MLA Yetiş, M. , Yurdakul, E. "The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach" . Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 (2021 ): 988-991 <http://jsurgmed.com/en/pub/issue/64812/901094>
Chicago Yetiş, M. , Yurdakul, E. "The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach". Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 (2021 ): 988-991
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach AU - Mehmet Yetiş , Emre Yurdakul Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.28982/josam.901094 DO - 10.28982/josam.901094 T2 - Journal of Surgery and Medicine JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 988 EP - 991 VL - 5 IS - 9 SN - -2602-2079 M3 - doi: 10.28982/josam.901094 UR - https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.901094 Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal of Surgery and Medicine The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach %A Mehmet Yetiş , Emre Yurdakul %T The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach %D 2021 %J Journal of Surgery and Medicine %P -2602-2079 %V 5 %N 9 %R doi: 10.28982/josam.901094 %U 10.28982/josam.901094
ISNAD Yetiş, Mehmet , Yurdakul, Emre . "The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach". Journal of Surgery and Medicine 5 / 9 (September 2021): 988-991 . https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.901094
AMA Yetiş M. , Yurdakul E. The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach. J Surg Med. 2021; 5(9): 988-991.
Vancouver Yetiş M. , Yurdakul E. The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach. Journal of Surgery and Medicine. 2021; 5(9): 988-991.
IEEE M. Yetiş and E. Yurdakul , "The effects of capsular repair on quality of life after hip arthroplasty with the anterolateral approach", Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 988-991, Sep. 2021, doi:10.28982/josam.901094

The DNS issue is resolved. jsurgmed.com and current publication are fully accessible.

To use the submission system properly, please use one of the following browsers, Chrome or Firefox, with the latest updates.
If you experience problems, it may be necessary to clear the browser cache and history; and disable blocker extensions, i.e., uBlock, of the browsers
Mobile phones are not recommended, please use a personal computer.