Clinical outcomes of pediatric extracorporeal life support: Single center experience
Clinical outcomes of pediatric extracorporeal life support
Keywords:
extracorporeal life support, children, heart failure, respiratory failure, intensive careAbstract
Background/Aim: The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in children has notably increased over the last two decades, the indications for its use are expanding. According to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) 2016 report, the rate of pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) runs was 24% among all ECMO patients. A relationship between higher ECMO volume and mortality for neonates and adult patients supported with ECLS was reported. Different mortality rates were reported for different diagnostic and age groups for ECMO patients. The objective of this study was to describe our experience with pediatric ECMO.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients between 1 month and 18 years who underwent ECMO treatment in a pediatric intensive care unit from January 2015 to June 2022. Patients’ characteristics, outcomes, and complications were recorded.
Results: A total of 22 children underwent ECMO during the study period. The median age of the patients was 4.5 years (ranging from 2 months to 18 years). Eight (36.4%) patients required venoarterial (VA) ECMO, and 14 patients (63.6%) required venovenous (VV) ECMO. Among the eight children who underwent VA ECMO, central cannulation was performed in 62.5% of cases. Seven children who required VV ECMO were cannulated with a double lumen catheter (42.8%). Thirteen (59.1%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO. Weaning rates were 25% and 78.5% for VA and VV ECMO, respectively. Among 22 patients, overall hospital mortality was 72.7%. Mortality rates were 87.5% and 64.2% for VA and VV ECMO. Five patients (22.7%) survived to hospital discharge.
Conclusion: Extracorporeal life support is one of the life-saving treatment modalities. This study found that the children requiring VA ECMO had a higher mortality rate than children requiring VV ECMO, a result that is consistent with the ELSO registry report. In our study, children requiring VV ECMO had a higher weaning rate than the ELSO registry data. However, they had a lower survival to discharge rate than the ELSO registry data. We feel that by describing this case series, the spread of ECMO practice may be supported in Turkey.
Downloads
References
Lequier L. Extracorporeal life support in pediatric and neonatal critical care: a review. J Intensive Care Med. 2004;19:243-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066604267650
Bartlett RH, Gattinoni L. Current status of extracorporeal life support (ECMO) for cardiopulmonary failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010;76:534-40.
Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Huxtable RF, Schippers HC, O'Connor MJ, Jefferies MR. Extracorporeal circulation (ECMO) in neonatal respiratory failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;74:826-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(19)41180-X
Thiagarajan RR, Barbaro RP, Rycus PT, Mcmullan DM, Conrad SA, Fortenberry JD, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry International Report 2016. ASAIO J. 2017 Jan/Feb;63(1):60-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000475
Barbaro RP, Paden ML, Guner YS, Raman L, Ryerson LM, Alexander P, et al. Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry International Report 2016. ASAIO J. 2017 Jul/Aug;63(4):456-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000603
Maclaren G, Butt W, Best D, Donath S, Taylor A. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory septic shock in children: one institutionʼs experience. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8(5):447-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PCC.0000282155.25974.8F
Solé A, Jordan I, Bobillo S, Moreno J, Balaguer M, Hernández-Platero L, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for neonatal and pediatric refractory septic shock: more than 15 years of learning. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(8):1191-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3174-2
Lin JC. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Pediatric Respiratory Failure. Respir Care. 2017 Jun;62(6):732-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05338
Taka H, Kotani Y, Kuroko Y, Iwadou S, Iwasaki T, Kasahara S. Risk factors and outcomes of pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021 Nov;29(9):916-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492321997379
Maratta C, Potera RM, van Leeuwen G, Castillo Moya A, Raman L, Annich GM. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO): 2020 Pediatric Respiratory ELSO Guideline. ASAIO J. 2020 Sep/Oct;66(9):975-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001223
Brown G, Moynihan KM, Deatrick KB, Hoskote A, Sandhu HS, Aganga D, et al. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO): Guidelines for Pediatric Cardiac Failure. ASAIO J. 2021 May 1;67(5):463-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001431
Karamlou T, Vafaeezadeh M, Parrish AM, Cohen GA, Welke KF, Permut L, et al. Increased extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center case volume is associated with improved extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survival among pediatric patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):470-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.037
Freeman CL, Bennett TD, Casper TC, Larsen GY, Hubbard A, Wilkes J, et al. Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does center volume impact mortality? Crit Care Med. 2014;42:512-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000435674.83682.96
Downloads
- 174 343
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pınar Yazıcı Özkaya, Hamdi Metin, Kazım Zararcı, İrem Ersayoğlu, Gülizar Turan, Osman Nuri Tuncer, Bülent Karapınar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.