Psychological and social effects of COVID-19 pandemic on obstetrics and gynecology employees

Authors

Keywords:

COVID-19, Anxiety, Healthcare professionals, Corona virus pandemic

Abstract

Aim: COVID-19 pandemic affected most health care professionals and to the best of our knowledge, there has not been any studies on the gynecology and obstetrics department workers in the literature. In our study, we aim to investigate the psychological and social effects of the COVID-19 epidemic on the healthcare workers serving in the gynecology and obstetrics department and to help healthcare professionals improve their physical and mental health.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology clinics in Mardin province. It was carried out in Mardin State Hospital and Kızıltepe State Hospital, which are considered “Pandemic Hospitals”. All participants received Sociodemographic Data Form, Psychological Symptom Screening Test (SCL-90-R), Beck Anxiety Inventory and Short Psychiatric Rating Scale. These evaluation scales were applied to 13 doctors, 52 midwives and 38 nurses working in Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinics in total. They were compared in terms of occupation, gender, and age, as those under or equal to 29 (≤29) years and over 29 years (>29) of age. Twenty-nine was picked because it was the mean age of the group.
Results: Although differences did not reach statistical significance, anxiety, hostility, and phobic anxiety were higher in participants over the age of 29 years (P=0.472, P=0.549, P=0.776, respectively). According to profession groups, only phobic anxiety scores were higher among doctors (P=0.373), and somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoid ideation, psychoticism, eating and gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) were higher in midwives (P=0.166, P=0.624, P=0.531, P=0.321, P=0.147, P=0.205, P=0.359, P=0.490, P=0.696, P=0.557, respectively).
Conclusion: COVID-19 will undoubtedly have psychological consequences which may be permanent in healthcare professionals. Frontline employees will be at risk, especially in departments with emergency services. Actions are needed to alleviate the effects of COVID-19 on mental health by protecting and promoting the psychological well-being of healthcare workers during and after the outbreak.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e203976. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976

Zhang W, Wang K, Yin L, Zhao W, Xue Q, Peng M, et al. Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China. Psychother Psychosom 2020. doi: 10.1159/000507639

Petzold MB, Plag J, Ströhle A. Umgang mit psychischer Belastung bei Gesundheitsfachkräften im Rahmen der Covid-19-Pandemie [Dealing with psychological distress by healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemia]. Nervenarzt. 2020;91(5):417‐421. doi:10.1007/s00115-020-00905-0

Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Report of final natality statistics, 1995.Monthly vital statistics report; vol 45 no 11, supp. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 1997.

Ulusoy M. Beck Anksiyete Envanteri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Yayınlanmamış uzmanlık tezi. Bakırköy Ruh ve Sinir Hastalıkları Hastanesi, İstanbul; 1993.

Eren I, Sahin M, Tunc SE, Cure E, Civi II: Psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in patients with Behçet’s disease. Neurol Psychiatr Brain Res. 2006;13:169-74.

Kılıç M . Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R)'nin Geçerlilik ve Güvenirliği. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. 1991;1(2):45-52.

Dağ İ. Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R)’nin Üniversite Öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 1991;2:1.

Soykan Ç. Institutional differences and case typicality as related to diagnosis symptom severity, prognosis and treatment. Yayınlanmıs master tezi. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi; 1990.

Tsamakis K, Rizos E, J Manolis A, Chaidou S, Kympouropoulos S, Spartalis E, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on mental health of healthcare professionals. Exp Ther Med. 2020 Jun;19(6):3451-3. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8646.

Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L, et al. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X.

Chew QH, Wei KC, Vasoo S, Chua HC, Sim K. Narrative synthesis of psychological and coping responses towards emerging infectious disease outbreaks in the general population: practical considerations for the COVID-19 pandemic. Singapore Med J 2020. doi:10.11622/smedj.2020046

Blake H, Bermingham F, Johnson G, Tabner A. Mitigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Healthcare Workers: A Digital Learning Package. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):E2997. doi:10.3390/ijerph17092997

Bohlken J, Schömig F, Lemke MR, Pumberger M, Riedel-Heller SG. COVID-19-Pandemie: Belastungen des medizinischen Personals [COVID-19 Pandemic: Stress Experience of Healthcare Workers - A Short Current Review]. Psychiatr Prax. 2020;47(4):190‐7. doi:10.1055/a-1159-5551

Lemogne C, Hoertel N, Airagnes G, Limosin F. Pronostic des troubles anxieux [Prognosis of anxiety disorders]. Rev Prat. 2019;69(9):979‐80.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-01

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Uzun ND, Tekin M, Sertel E, Tuncar A. Psychological and social effects of COVID-19 pandemic on obstetrics and gynecology employees. J Surg Med [Internet]. 2020 May 1 [cited 2022 Nov. 30];4(5):355-8. Available from: https://jsurgmed.com/article/view/735384