Assessment of disease activity with simplified joint ultrasonography method in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Assessment of disease activity with ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis

Authors

Keywords:

Disease activity, Rheumatoid arthritis, Ultrasound

Abstract

Background/Aim: Ultrasound (US) is a highly useful tool for assessing the disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). On the other hand, examining all joints could be time-consuming and unfeasible. Defining the number of joints and which joints should be tested is essential to accurately measuring RA activity. Several simplified US methods are undergoing development for this purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between simplified 12-joint US findings and physical examination findings/disease activity in RA patients.

Methods: This cohort study included 62 RA patients who had been undergoing treatment for at least three months. Multiplanar grayscale images and power Doppler (PD) of the 12 joints (bilateral elbow, wrist, second and third metacarpophalangeal [MCP] joints, knee, and ankle) were acquired and compared with clinical assessments. Disease activity was assessed using the clinical disease activity and simplified disease activity indices and disease activity score-28 (CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28, respectively). Synovial effusion, synovial proliferation, and PD US scores were calculated for 12 joints. Correlations between US scores and disease activity, clinical examination, and acute phase reactants were assessed.

Results: The number of joints with PD activity and US total and US synovial proliferation scores showed weak correlations with clinical activity scores (r = 0.25, r = 0.26, and r = 0.28 for SDAI and r = 0.23, r = 0.26, and r = 0.28 for DAS28, respectively). The CDAI did not present any statistically significant correlations. The agreement between US findings and clinical joint examination was generally weak. PD activities of the second MCP joints (r = 0.84, P < 0.01) and knees (r = 0.42, P < 0.01) mostly correlated with clinical examination although it was weakly correlated at the third MCP (r = 0.152) and wrist (r = 0.148), and not correlated at the elbow (r = 0.125).

Conclusion: The weak correlation between US findings and clinical examination/disease activity suggests that clinical examination alone may not be sufficient to determine joint inflammation and disease activity. US could provide a more accurate assessment of RA patients and aid in medication selection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jeffery RC. Clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Medicine. 2010;38(4):167–71. doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2009.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2009.12.004

Arend CF. Ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis: what rheumatologists should know. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2013;53(1):88–100. doi: 10.1016/s2255-5021(13)70009-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2255-5021(13)70009-9

Rees JD, Pilcher J, Heron C, Kiely PD. A comparison of clinical vs ultrasound determined synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis utilizing gray-scale, power Doppler and the intravenous microbubble contrast agent ‘Sono-Vue'. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46(3):454–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel256

Nemoto T, Ogasawara M, Matsuki Y, Murayama G, Yamada Y, Sugisaki N, et al. Can routine clinical measures predict ultrasound-determined synovitis and remission in rheumatoid arthritis patients? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(1):54–60.

Gilek-Seibert K, Prescott K, Kazi S. Outcome assessments in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013;15(11):370. doi: 10.1007/s11926-013-0370-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-013-0370-y

Brown AK. Using ultrasonography to facilitate best practice in diagnosis and management of RA. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5(12):698–706. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2009.227

Mandl P, Balint P, Brault Y, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, Grassi W, et al. Clinical and ultrasound-based composite disease activity indices in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from a randomized, multicentre study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65(6):879-87. doi: 10.1002/acr.21913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21913

Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, Klarlund M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(4):955-62. doi: 10.1002/art.10877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10877

Ben Abdelghani K, Miladi S, Souabni L, Kassab S, Chekili S, Laatar A, et al. Role of ultrasound in assessing remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.07.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2014.07.006

Mandl P, Kurucz P, Niedermayer D, Balint PV, Smolen JS. Contributions of ultrasound beyond clinical data in assessing inflammatory disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: current insights and future prospects. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(12):2136-42. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu211

Xiao H, Liu M, Tan L, Liao X, Li Y, Gao J, et al. Value of ultrasonography for diagnosis of synovitis associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;17(7):767-75. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12390

Perricone C, Ceccarelli F, Modesti M, Vavala C, Di Franco M, Valesini G, et al. The 6-joint ultrasonographic assessment: a valid, sensitive-to-change and feasible method for evaluating joint inflammation in RA. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(5):866-73. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker405

Naredo E, Rodríguez M, Campos C, Rodríguez-Heredia JM, Medina JA, Giner E, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr 15;59(4):515-22. doi: 10.1002/art.23529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23529

Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, Strunk J, Backhaus TM, Hartung W, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: A pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(9):1194-201. doi: 10.1002/art.24646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24646

Kawashiri SY, Kawakami A, Iwamoto N, Fujikawa K, Satoh K, Tamai M, et al. The power Doppler ultrasonography score from 24 synovial sites or 6 simplified synovial sites, including the metacarpophalangeal joints, reflects the clinical disease activity and level of serum biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(5):962-5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq415

Garrigues F, Jousse-Joulin S, Bouttier R, Nonent M, Bressollette L, Saraux A. Concordance between clinical and ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2013;80(6):597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.03.011.

Dale J, Purves D, McConnachie A, McInnes I, Porter D. Tightening up? Impact of musculoskeletal ultrasound disease activity assessment on early rheumatoid arthritis patients treated using a treat to target strategy. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;66(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/acr.22218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22218

Naredo E, Gamero F, Bonilla G, Uson J, Carmona L, Laffon A. Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of extended versus reduced joint evaluation. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(6):881-4.

Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, Filippucci E, Backhaus M, D'Agostino MA, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(12):2485-7.

Iagnocco A, Ceccarelli F, Perricone C, Gattamelata A, Finucci A, Ricci E, et al. The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in a Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic. Med Ultrason. 2014 Dec;16(4):332-5. doi: 10.11152/mu.201.3.2066.164.fcc2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11152/mu.201.3.2066.164.fcc2

Kane D, Grassi W, Sturrock R, Balint PV. Musculoskeletal ultrasound--a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 2: Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(7):829-38. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh215

Zheng G, Wang L, Jia X, Li F, Yan Y, Yu Z. Application of high frequency color Doppler ultrasound in the monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Exp Ther Med. 2014;8(6):1807-1812. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.2001

Wakefield RJ, D'Agostino MA, Naredo E, Buch MH, Iagnocco A, Terslev L, et al. After treat-to-target: can a targeted ultrasound initiative improve RA outcomes? Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(6):799-803. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201048

Martins FM, da Silva JA, Santos MJ, Vieira-Sousa E, Duarte C, Santos H, et al. DAS28, CDAI and SDAI cutoffs do not translate the same information: results from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register Reuma.pt. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54(2):286-91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu313

Gaujoux-Viala C, Mouterde G, Baillet A, Claudepierre P, Fautrel B, Le Loët X, et al. Evaluating disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: which composite index is best? A systematic literature analysis of studies comparing the psychometric properties of the DAS, DAS28, SDAI and CDAI. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79(2):149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.04.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.04.008

Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, Conaghan PG, Peterfy CG, Hensor E, et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(12):3761-73. doi: 10.1002/art.22190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22190

Aletaha D, Nell VP, Stamm T, Uffmann M, Pflugbeil S, Machold K, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(4):R796-806. doi: 10.1186/ar1740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/ar1740

Fukae J, Tanimura K, Atsumi T, Koike T. Sonographic synovial vascularity of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(4):586-91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket311

Chakr RMDS, Mendonça JA, Brenol CV, Xavier RM, Brenol CT. Assessing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity with ultrasound. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(9):1249-54. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2291-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2291-6

Le Boedec M, Jousse-Joulin S, Ferlet JF, Marhadour T, Chales G, Grange L, et al. Factors influencing concordance between clinical and ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(3):244-52. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.120843

Szkudlarek M, Narvestad E, Klarlund M, Court-Payen M, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. Ultrasonography of the metatarsophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(7):2103-12. doi: 10.1002/art.20333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20333

Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, Loreck D, Fritz J, Wolf KJ, et al. Arthritis of the finger joints: A comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(6):1232-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1232::AID-ANR21>3.0.CO;2-3

Gärtner M, Mandl P, Radner H, Supp G, Machold KP, Aletaha D, et al. Sonographic joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: Associations with clinical joint assessment during a state of remission. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(8):2005-14. doi: 10.1002/art.38016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38016

Naredo E, Monteagudo I. Doppler techniques. 2014;32(1 Suppl 80):S12-9.

Yoshimi R, Hama M, Takase K, Ihata A, Kishimoto D, Terauchi K, et al. Ultrasonography is a potent tool for the prediction of progressive joint destruction during clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2013;23(3):456-65. doi: 10.1007/s10165-012-0690-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/s10165-012-0690-1

Abbasi L, Haidri FR. Fibromyalgia complicating disease management in rheumatoid arthritis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014;24(6):424-7.

Ranzolin A, Brenol JC, Bredemeier M, Guarienti J, Rizzatti M, Feldman D, et al. Association of concomitant fibromyalgia with worse disease activity score in 28 joints, health assessment questionnaire, and short form 36 scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(6):794-800. doi: 10.1002/art.24430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24430

Garrigues F, Jousse-Joulin S, Bouttier R, Nonent M, Bressollette L, Saraux A. Concordance between clinical and ultrasound findings in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2013;80(6):597-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.03.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.03.011

Geng Y, Han J, Deng X, Zhang Z. Presence of power Doppler synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with synthetic and/or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: experience from a Chinese cohort. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(8):1061-6. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2634-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2634-y

Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M. Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(9):2018-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2018::AID-ART350>3.0.CO;2-C

Endo Y, Kawashiri SY, Morimoto S, Nishino A, Okamoto M, Tsuji S, et al. Utility of a simplified ultrasonography scoring system among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(1):e23254. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023254

Downloads

Published

2022-06-29

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

1.
Orucoglu N, Alp A, Yurtkuran DM. Assessment of disease activity with simplified joint ultrasonography method in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Assessment of disease activity with ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis. J Surg Med [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 29 [cited 2022 Aug. 18];6(6):623-8. Available from: https://jsurgmed.com/article/view/1014924